A look at the trial I blog about, may make him puke his guts out.
Criminal misconduct, in my trial alone, the government would have to build a new prison.
In Sen. Ted Stevens case, justice system failed
Among the many ways justice can be frustrated, even corrupted, prosecutorial misconduct ranks among the worst. Not only can it send innocent defendants to prison, but it robs the system of something fundamental -- public trust.
That's what transpired in the conviction last fall of Ted Stevens, then a Republican U.S. Senator from Alaska, and led U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder to ask last week that the conviction be tossed out.
But that's not enough. The Bush Justice Department prosecutors who withheld evidence from Stevens' attorneys that might have exonerated him must be called to account.
This is not a case where prosecutors can credibly claim an innocent mistake or oversight. The evidence withheld involved interview statements by the prosecution's key witness against Stevens that differed sharply from his sworn testimony at trial.
It was classic cross-examination material -- and Justice Department lawyers made sure Stevens lawyers never heard it.
From the start, the prosecutors' conduct seems unprofessional, even reprehensible. Federal Judge Emmet G. Sullivan repeatedly chastised them for hiding potentially exculpatory information. At one point, he almost declared a mistrial, and later cited two prosecutors for contempt for refusing to deliver documents he had demanded.
Few public officials possess more power for good or evil than prosecutors -- county, state or federal. A prosecutor can, as the cliche has it, "indict a ham sandwich."
At the same time, the office is regularly a stepping stone to promotions or even to higher elective office, and thus carries the temptation to amass a conviction record, even at a cost to defendant's rights. Something like that seems to have driven Stevens' prosecutors.
Holder has promised a full examination of the Stevens prosecutors' conduct, presumably with prosecution if warranted. Nothing less will do. http://blog.nj.com/njv_editorial_page/2009/04/in_sen_ted_stevens_case_justic.html
ILL attorney general madigan, aids, endorses, encourages, corruption, obstruction of justice, perjury, false court documents, hidden agenda
Alvarez aids, endorses, encourages covers ups, obstructs justice for Palatine, add Scotillo's corrupt law bar, you got one wicked town
Another of a lawyer king pin....Queen pin, who has no respect of any of the oaths she has taken, no respect the the law, just don't give a hoot
Officer Wenrich knew his report was wrong, he was out of it that evening, along with his fellow arresting officers, his testimony would be false (perjury).
My defense lawyer (# 1 of 5) (the mayor's brother) knew Wenrich'sreport was false and that Wenrich's testimony would be false, perjury.
Scotillo, knew all of this also and must have said, something like, don't worry, who cares? We'll nail this suckers ass, regardless, lets play ball,,,,, oh,,,,, what ever Wenrich was on that night, must have beenpretty good, tell him to get me some.
Now we get into Chief Bratcher opportunity for some free money.
Why did Tatooles really, want to give $120k? I say because Bratcherknew that Tatooles was involved in obstruction of justice, (because one of Bratchers flunky's) and probably some other things. Bratcher, was going to arrest a Tatooles, unless Tatooles coughed up some money. So they schemed up this plan to for Inverness to pay Bratcher for a report, to recommend another Bratcher's stooges for the top cop inInverness. The saps on the Inverness village council, will play right along. Bratcher probably tapped Haas for a finder fee, and why stop there, probably did the same to Chandra and Andre, maybe extorted money from Scotillo, who knows? I would bet there is a easy $1/2 million bucks Bratcher pocked, cause Wenrich and others were out of their mind, hallucinating that night when he pulled me over and the cover up that followed.
So Alvarez has gone along, it her turn, to play cover up, obstruct justice, you name it, she is the top dog of a highly trained organized crime operation. This is all her choice, all her education, diplomas, degrees, mean nothing other than a waste of money, she is just a common thug, that is the top of organized crime, the Cook County States Attorney's office, in a high place...........you know what they say, the higher you are, the harder the fall.